Trump has long warned of a government 'deep state.' Now in power, he's under pressure to expose it

Trump has long warned of a government 'deep state.' Now in power, he's under pressure to expose it

NEW YORK (AP) — As he crisscrossed the country in 2024,Donald Trumppledged to supporters that voting him back into the presidency would be "our final battle." "With you at my side, we willdemolish the deep state," he said repeatedly on the campaign trail. "We will liberate our country from these tyrants and villains once and for all." Four months into his second term, Trump has continued to stoke dark theories involving his predecessors and other powerful politicians and attorneys — most recently raising the specter of nefarious intent behind former President Joe Biden's use of an autopen to sign papers. The administration has pledged to reopen investigations and has taken steps to declassify certain documents, including releasingmore than 63,000 pages of recordsrelated to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Yet many of Trump's supporters say it's not enough. Some who take him at his word are beginning to get restless as they ask why his administration, which holds the keys to chasing down these alleged government secrets, is denying them the evidence and retribution they expected. His Justice Department has not yet arrested hordes of "deep state" actors as some of his supporters had hoped it would, even as the president has been posting cryptic videos and memes about Democratic politicians. "People are tired of not knowing," conservative commentator Damani Felder said on podcaster Tim Pool's show last week. "We actually demand answers and real transparency. It's not that hard to deliver." A promise to reveal and dismantle the 'deep state' Trump has long promised to dismantle the "deep state" — a supposed secret network of powerful people manipulating government decisions behind the scenes — to build his base of support, said Yotam Ophir, a communications professor at the University at Buffalo. "He built part of this universe, which at the end of the day is a fictional universe," he said. Now that Trump is in power and has stocked loyalists throughout his administration, his supporters expect all to be revealed. Delivering on that is difficult when many of the conspiracies he alleged aren't real, said Joseph Uscinski, a political scientist who studies conspiracy theories at the University of Miami. To be sure, the president has prioritized retribution in his second administration. He has fired federal workers, installed loyalists in key positions and targetedlaw firms he disfavorsin executive orders. He has ordered therevocation of government security clearancesfor political rivals andformer employees who dissentedduring his first term. His Justice Department hasfired prosecutorswho investigated him andscrutinized career FBI agentswho investigated theJan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Even so, Trump's administration hasn't gone as far as many of his supporters would like. They want to see steps taken against people he has long claimed were involved in sinister plots against him, such as former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and formerFBI Director James Comey. The administration also hasn't offered proof of the "egregious crimes" that Trump claims have corrupted the federal government for years. Conspiracy theorists focus on Epstein and Trump's assassination attempt Tensions erupted this month when FBI DirectorKash Pateland his deputy, Dan Bongino, dismissed two of the unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that have animated Trump's base the most — that financier and sexual abuserJeffrey Epsteinwas murdered in a cover-up, and that Trump'sattempted assassinationin Butler, Pennsylvania, was a government plot. "You know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was," Patel said about Epstein's death in a Fox News interview. "I have seen the whole file," Bongino added. "He killed himself." Conservatives online demanded to see the evidence, pointing to Bongino's past statements as apodcast host, when he suggested the government was hiding information about Epstein. "No matter who gets elected, you get the same foreign policy, you get the same economic policy, and the Epstein videos remain secret," right-wing podcaster and former Fox News hostTucker Carlsonsaid on his show. "They told us for months leading up to the Election that it wasn't suicide," Newsmax host Todd Starnes wrote on X.. "But now they tell us it was suicide." He added: "Pardon me, but what the heck is going on at DOJ?" Attorney General Pam Bondi said this month that FBI officials were poring through "tens of thousands" of videos related to Epstein and would make more materials public once they took steps to protect the victims. In the same Fox News interview, Bongino and Patel said they had been briefed on the attempted assassination of Trump during a rally in July and there was no explosive conspiracy to be revealed. "In some of these cases, the 'there' you're looking for is not there," Bongino said. Skepticism among 'deep state' believers Bongino appeared to try to throw a bone to Trump's base this week when he announced the agency would reopen some prominent cases that have attracted public interest. He said the FBI would investigate theplanting of pipe bombsfound near the Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington the day of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, the leak of the Supreme Court'sDobbs v. Jackson draft opinionin 2022 that overturned the constitutional right to abortion and the discovery ofcocaine in the White Housein 2023. But it wasn't enough for everyone who weighed in on his X account. "Anything to detract from the Epstein files," one user replied to his announcement. "No results," wrote another. In an interview Thursday on "Fox & Friends," Bongino teased that the FBI would soon release video captured outside Epstein's jail cell and materials related to Trump's attempted assassination. He said he understands the public's demands for transparency but called for patience and noted not all information is the FBI's to declassify. That didn't satisfy everyone who wants answers to the conspiracy theories. "I am convinced that the deep state can only be defeated by God at this point," Philip Anderson, a right-wing influencer who participated in the riot at the Capitol, wrote Thursday on X. "Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and Pam Bondi are completely useless." Promoting conspiracy theories as a tactic to distract All the while, Trump has continued promoting conspiracy theories on his Truth Social platform and elsewhere. He shared a video this month about mysterious deaths allegedly being linked to the Clinton family and an image of himself with former President Barack Obama with the text, "ALL ROADS LEAD TO OBAMA, RETRUTH IF YOU WANT MILITARY TRIBUNALS." Ophir, the University at Buffalo professor, said it's a tactic that distracts Trump's base and helps inoculate him from criticism. "When something good happens, it's because Trump is great and his agenda is brilliant," Ophir said. "When something bad happens, it's because of the Obamas or the Clintons or whatever forces are undermining him from within Washington." Trump this week fueled newer theories, without sharing evidence, that Biden's use of a mechanical device called an autopen during his presidency meant he didn't sign his executive orders willingly or that aides profited from controlling it. He has called for people who operated it to be charged with "TREASON." The narrative has gained momentum on the right because of allegations that Biden's aidescovered up his mental and physical decline. Presidentshave used autopensfor years to sign certain documents. "Whoever used it was usurping the power of the Presidency, and it should be very easy to find out who that person (or persons) is," Trump wrote on Truth Social. At least one user of his platform was unimpressed and questioned why Trump and his allies, holding all the power, still didn't have any answers. "IF IT'S EASY," the commenter posted. "WHY HASN'T YOUR ADMINISTRATION FOUND THESE CRIMINAL'S ALREADY." ___ The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about the AP's democracy initiativehere. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

byRoger Fisher

in

May 30, 2025

Trump has long warned of a government 'deep state.' Now in power, he's under pressure to expose it

Trump has long warned of a government 'deep state.' Now in power, he's under pressure to expose it NEW YORK (AP) — As he crisscr...

Read More

Skeletal remains found at Jersey Shore identified as 19th century boat captain

Skeletal remains found at Jersey Shore identified as 19th century boat captain

There's been a break in 30-year-old cold case mystery at the Jersey Shore after experts confirmed skeletal remains found on three beachesbelonged to a 19th-century boat captain. The bones from a leg, arm and fragments of a cranium discovered on the beaches of Ocean City, Margate and Longport between 1995 and 2013 had yielded no answers until now. Authorities said the remains belong to 29-year-old Captain Henry Goodsell, who died at sea 181 years ago. Advances in DNA technology first tied the bones to the same person after cold case detectives with the state police turned tothe Investigative Genetic Genealogy Center at Ramapo College of New Jerseylast year. "Our job was to figure out who that individual was that the bones belonged to," Cairenn Binder of the college's IGG Center said. Initially, experts weren't even sure how old the bones were. "We kind of kept going back and forth between, are they historic? Are they not historic?" New Jersey State Police Forensic Anthropologist Dr. Anna Delaney said. "This is absolutely amazing because after all of this time, Henry has his name." Students at the school launched a search for genetic relatives and built out family trees that revealed ancestral ties to Connecticut. They also started looking into records of shipwrecks. It was that creative step that really helped them narrow in on the person's identity. "Delving into those they identified this ship, which then led to the ship captain," Ramapo's IGG Center Director David Gurney explained. Goodsell was the captain of the Oriental which was a schooner that was transporting marble from Connecticut to Philadelphia for Girard College in 1844. But, on that voyage, the Oriental went down just off of the coast of Brigantine and the entire crew was killed. Investigators were able to track down Goodsell's great-great-granddaughter in Maryland. She provided a DNA sample that did confirm the captain's identity. "To our knowledge, this is the oldest case that's ever been solved with investigative genetic genealogy," Binder said. As of this writing, Goodsell's family does not want his bones so they will stay at a state repository indefinitely.

byRoger Fisher

in

May 30, 2025

Skeletal remains found at Jersey Shore identified as 19th century boat captain

Skeletal remains found at Jersey Shore identified as 19th century boat captain There's been a break in 30-year-old cold case mystery at ...

Read More

Pediatrician who helped expose Flint's water crisis now fighting poverty

Pediatrician who helped expose Flint's water crisis now fighting poverty

Flint, Michigan— At a parade last year in Flint, Michigan, every family and their babies celebrated a gift from the same woman —pediatrician Dr. Mona Hanna. "How can you say no to these babies? Like how can you say no?" Hanna told CBS News. Rx kids, a program she created to give cash to pregnant moms, is an American first. "I wanted something that literally would be able to prescribe away the pathogen of poverty," Hanna said. "I wanted something that I could pull out of my doctor's bag, pull out of my white coat that literally would be able to prescribe away the pathogen of poverty. Poverty makes kids sick. So I wanted to prevent it." She's raised more than $100 million, 80% of which is from private donors. Now, every expectant mother in Flint, regardless of income, can get $1,500 during her pregnancy. Once the baby is born, it's $500 a month for up to a year — no strings attached. "So what we are hearing from our families is that this amount of money is a lifesaver, a game changer for our families," Hanna said. "They can afford to pay their rent. They can buy diapers for their baby. They can buy formula. They don't have to choose between being homeless or having a roof over their heads." When asked how to know if the money is being spent on the right things, Hanna said, "This is based on global evidence. Our families...through multiple surveys, we know that they're spending this money No. 1 on baby supplies, and then on food, rent utilities, transportation, childcare." "We are telling families, 'We see you, we hear you, and we trust you,'" she added. Hanna knows child poverty runs in Flint's bloodstream. In 2015,she brought national attentionto the city's corroding water pipes andlinked them to children with lead poisoning. Now she's tackling poverty. In four areas of Michigan, any expectant mother can apply. But in Flint, the program reports 60% of enrolled families have an annual household income of less than $10,000. When Angela Sintery was pregnant with her daughter Jolena, she remembers filling out a five-minute questionnaire. "Two weeks later, I had money in my bank account," Sintery said, adding that the money allowed her not to stress out and focus on her baby instead. Michigan State Sen. John Damoose is a conservative Republican from a red district. He's no fan of handouts, but pushed hard to get Rx Kids in his district. "It's extremely efficient. There's no government bureaucracy whatsoever. This is actually a great program that meets people right where they need it," Damoose said. Since early last year, Rx Kids has spread roughly $10 million to more than 2,200 families. "This is a plug-and-play program. It is already built with dollars at the table. We are ready to go live in communities across the nation," Hanna said. E.l.f. Beauty calls Hailey Bieber an industry disruptor amid Rhode sale These 3 record breakers have one thing in common Reporter's Notebook: John Dickerson reflects on his spelling woes

byRoger Fisher

in

May 30, 2025

Pediatrician who helped expose Flint's water crisis now fighting poverty

Pediatrician who helped expose Flint's water crisis now fighting poverty Flint, Michigan— At a parade last year in Flint, Michigan, ever...

Read More

If trade court ruling stands, Trump seen shifting to other options for tariff assault

If trade court ruling stands, Trump seen shifting to other options for tariff assault

By David Lawder (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's global tariff assault may be slowed but won't be stopped by court rulings that may ultimately force a shift to other legal authorities for his campaign to pressure countries into trade concessions, trade and legal experts say. Their advice to foreign governments, companies and other clients: Assume that Trump will not give up on his tariffs and that they will resume in one form or another. For now, an emergency stay of the Court of International Trade's ruling against Trump's tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act will keep them in place for the time being, maintaining leverage over trading partners. "This is just the opening salvo," said Dan Ujczo a lawyer and U.S.-Canada trade expert at Thompson Hine in Columbus, Ohio. "The Trump administration has a number of options including reframing the executive orders to include some of the boundaries used in the CIT opinion." The Manhattan-based trade court ruled late on Wednesday that Trump overstepped his legal authority in imposing punitive tariffs under IEEPA, a 1977 law that has primarily been used for sanctions. IEEPA's main advantage was its speed and seemingly broad scope, which suited Trump's desire to move quickly to impose tariffs within weeks of his January 20 inauguration through the use of executive orders. This avoided lengthy trade investigations and public comment periods under more traditional authorities for imposing tariffs through executive action, including the Section 301 unfair trade practices statute used to impose tariffs on Chinese imports in 2018 and 2019 and the Section 232 national security statute used for steel, aluminum and autos tariffs. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro told reporters that if IEEPA ultimately becomes unavailable, the administration could invoke tariffs under either of the 232 or 301 authorities, as well as two other never-used trade authorities, including Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. "So you can assume that even if we lose, we will do it another way," Navarro said. 'CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASK FOR' Section 122 allows Trump to impose a 15% tariff for 150 days to restrict imports to address balance-of-payments problems or prevent significant depreciation of the dollar, but would require Congress to extend it after 150 days. Ironically, the statute was enacted as a result of the President Richard M. Nixon's 1971 imposition of a global 10% tariff under IEEPA's predecessor law, the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act. Legal experts had cited the Nixon tariffs as a potential parallel for using IEEPA to back Trump's tariffs. "I think the big picture here is we've got a very strong case with IEEPA, but the court basically tells us, if we lose that, we just do some other things. So nothing's really changed," Navarro told Bloomberg TV. Prior to announcing his April 2 global "Liberation Day" tariffs of 10-50%, some experts had anticipated that Trump would use the 85-year-old Section 338 to back them. The anti-trade discrimination statute has been threatened, but never invoked, and has largely disappeared from public records since the 1940s. It would allow Trump to impose additional tariffs of 15% up to 50% on goods from any country that discriminates against U.S. products in a way that puts American goods at a "disadvantage" compared to imports from other countries. Ujczo said Trump could also go back to Congress for more tariff authorities. These could make the tariffs more legally durable. "For folks celebrating this opinion, this may be a case of be careful what you ask for," he said. Kelly Ann Shaw, a former trade adviser to Trump in his first term and partner at the Akin Gump law firm in Washington, said Trump "is not going to just give up on his tariff strategy" regardless of the CIT and other IEEPA case outcomes. "I think there's plenty of other authority that the administration could use to justify very similar, or, if not the same, measures," Shaw said. "And so when I'm talking to companies, clients and governments, I think the safest thing to assume is that these tariffs will still continue to exist in some form, if not the identical one." (Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Dan Burns and Anna Driver)

byRoger Fisher

in

May 30, 2025

If trade court ruling stands, Trump seen shifting to other options for tariff assault

If trade court ruling stands, Trump seen shifting to other options for tariff assault By David Lawder (Reuters) -President Donald Trump...

Read More

Facing sky-high medical bills? Your hospital may have overcharged you

Facing sky-high medical bills? Your hospital may have overcharged you

After Blake Pfeifer, a veteran plumber in Colorado Springs, Colorado, underwent emergency stomach surgery at a nearby nonprofit hospital in 2022, he struggled to understand the bills flooding in for his weeklong stay. The initial charge for the procedure at the University of Colorado Health Memorial Hospital Central was $104,000, his records show. Because Pfeifer had no insurance and would be paying out of pocket, he was quoted a discounted price of $58,124. He said he called the hospital to get clarity on the bills but got nowhere. He began paying some of them and was pursued by a collection agency on others. Then he sought the help of a patient advocacy group. "I've always paid my bills," Pfeifer, 63, said. "I wanted a little better explanation." The group he worked with,Patient Rights Advocate.org, found that some of his charges were far higher than the amounts UCHealth reported under a federal price transparencyrulethat went into effect in 2021. And that wasn't the only notable finding: Only 25% of Pfeifer's charges showed up on the hospital's required price list and therefore could not be compared at all. Pfeifer's experience is not uncommon, according to patient advocates, public interest lawyers and Medicare data. The burden of medical debt, a problem faced by 100 million Americans, has pushed many to delay medical care and even file for bankruptcy, research shows. Making these obligations even more ruinous, patient advocates say, is that many may be based on inaccurate health care bills. These discrepancies occur even as hospitals must list prices for care on their websites. The price transparency rule,initiated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, requires facilities to "establish, update, and make public a list of all standard charges for all items and services." Implemented under the first Trump administration, it aims to help consumers shop for care and compare prices before they go to the hospital. Now, four years after the rule went into effect, hospital billing seems "intentionally complex," said Cynthia Fisher, founder ofPatient Rights Advocate.org. "Hospitals and insurance companies alike have even hired many middle-player firms to be able to maximize their margins and profits at every single patient encounter," she added. "Sometimes what we're finding is the charges like Blake's that are billed are far beyond even the highest rate that they have within their hospital pricing file." It adds up to an increasingly costly health care experience for Americans. A West Health-Gallupsurveypublished April 2 found that 35% of respondents said they could not access high-quality, affordable health care — a new high since 2021. UCHealth is a nonprofit hospital system with 14 hospitals in Colorado, southern Wyoming and western Nebraska. In its financial filings, UCHealth says its discount program for self-pay patients like Pfeifer "reduces uninsured patients' liabilities to a level more equivalent of insured patients." Some of Pfeifer's records conflict with this description. Pfeifer received 10 common blood tests, known as a metabolic panel, and was billed $104 for each. By comparison, UCHealth's public price data shows it charged insured patients between $6.52 and $52.89 for each test in 2022. In another case, Pfeifer was charged $99 for a blood culture to measure bacteria, the records show, while UCHealth's pricing data listed a range of charges for insured patients of between $8 and $61. For a phosphate level blood test, Pfeifer was billed $30, while insured patients at UCHealth were charged between $3.72 and $22.02. Under Coloradolaw, violations of hospital price transparency requirements are a deceptive trade practice. Dan Weaver, a UCHealth spokesman, said in a statement that the health system "does everything possible to share prices and estimates with our patients, encourage insurance coverage, assist patients in applying for Medicaid and other programs that may offer coverage." Regarding Pfeifer's case, Weaver said he could not comment because the hospital had received notice from a lawyer representing Pfeifer that he may file a claim against it. He said the hospital disputes what is in the lawyer's notice, but he declined to specify what exactly it disputes. Weaver pointed to thestate of Colorado's 2024 report stating that UCHealth hospitals "are fully compliant with transparency requirements." For 2022, when Pfeifer received care at UCHealth, the document showed the hospital providing his care received a "fair" transparency rating by the state, above "poor" but below "good." Weaver added that CMS, which determines hospital compliance with transparency requirements, "has not cited UCHealth or our hospitals for noncompliance." Enforcement actions are exceedingly rare. CMS' website listsmonetary penaltiesagainst only 27 hospitals in the four years since the requirements began. (There are 6,000 hospitals nationwide, according to theAmerican Hospital Association.) A December 2024reportfrom the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General found that nearly 40% of the 100 hospitals it studied were not complying with the price transparency requirements. Coloradolawallows patients to sue a hospital bringing a debt collection proceeding against them when they believe the facilities have violated price transparency requirements. Steve Woodrow, a Democratic member of the Colorado House of Representatives and a lawyer at the firm Edelson in Denver, represents Pfeifer. "What happened to Mr. Pfeifer unfortunately repeats itself and plays out across the country thousands of times every year," Woodrow told NBC News in an interview. "We now have a situation where people are afraid to get medical care because of the financial ramifications." Last November, the Justice Departmentallegedthat UCHealth had overbilled Medicare and TRICARE, the health insurer for U.S. service members and their families. Between November 2017 and March 31, 2021, the government alleged, providers at UCHealth hospitals submitted inflated Medicare and TRICARE claims for "frequent monitoring of vital signs" among patients in the emergency department. UCHealth agreed to pay $23 million to settle the allegations without an admission of liability. Weaver, the UCHealth spokesperson, said the hospital system settled to prevent a lengthy and costly legal dispute. "UCHealth firmly denies these allegations," he added, "and maintains that its billing practices align with the guidelines set forth by the American College of Emergency Physicians." While UCHealth is a nonprofit, it has generated rising revenues and earnings recently. Net patient revenues at UCHealth, itssecuritiesfilings show, totaled $8 billion in fiscal 2024, 17% higher than the previous year. Operating income was $523 million, an increase of 58% over 2023. UCHealth's charges for care are higher than most other nonprofits', Medicaredatashows. In fiscal 2022, the most recent figures available, UCHealth charged patients 6.6 times the hospital system's costs for care. That is far higher than the 4 times, on average, that U.S. nonprofit health systems charged for care that year, according to Ge Bai, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Weaver, of UCHealth, said the hospital system's charges are competitive with others. "Last year alone, UCHealth provided $1.3 billion in total community benefits including about $570 million in uncompensated care," his statement said. It's problem enough for patients who are overcharged or billed incorrectly for health care. But when hospitals sue to receive payment for those bills, such lawsuits often result in default judgments, legal experts say, issued to patients who don't appear in court or respond. Default judgments can have dire consequences, including wage garnishments. UCHealth has sued thousands of patients using third parties or debt collection middlemen in recent years, a practice that is examined in new research by academics at theGeorge Washington University Law School, Stanford University'sCenter for Clinical Researchand Fisher's group. The study, "Hospitals Suing Patients:The Rise of Stealth Intermediaries," found UCHealth and one debt collection firm brought 12,722 lawsuits against patients from 2019 to 2023. Legal records analyzed by the authors suggested "many of the collection efforts were based on unsubstantiated and inaccurate billing records." The use of legal middlemen is a national trend and allows hospitals to hide their involvement, avoiding the bad publicity these lawsuits can bring, the research contends. Last year, Colorado lawmakers enactedlegislationbarring hospitals from suing patients under debt collectors' names, after aninvestigationinto the practice by 9News, an NBC affiliate, and The Colorado Sun. Barak Richmanis the Alexander Hamilton professor of business law at George Washington Law School and a co-author of the study. "What this research shows is people are being pulled into court where a power imbalance takes advantage of them," he said. "There needs to be a lot of deliberative thought into what to do about courts as it relates to medical debt." In a statement about the study, UCHealth's Weaver said those suits make up a "tiny fraction of our patient care — in fact, more than 99.93% of all patient accounts are resolved without a lawsuit." He added: "This study, based on older data, does not reflect the changes put in place in recent years to minimize billing errors, ensure patients are aware of our financial assistance options, and are well informed of their medical bills." Damon Carson, a small-business owner in Longmont, Colorado, was sued by a collection company after he received an outpatient endoscopy at a UCHealth hospital in his town. The suit came while he was disputing the hospital's charges as excessive. A self-pay patient along with his wife, Traci, Carson tried to be a savvy shopper before he went in for the procedure in 2021. He asked for price estimates from several providers, and the nearby UCHealth facility provided one totaling $1,448, according to a court document. Carson paid upfront. "I had the procedure and everything was fine," Carson told NBC News. "Then the bills started rolling in." Additional charges of $4,742 drove the total cost for the procedure to around $6,200, a court document shows. Carson said that when he questioned the bills, noting the far lower original estimate, the hospital told him the add-on costs reflected the removal of growths found inside him during surgery. A UCHealth spokesman said the original estimate for Carson's care was accurate and that he was told there might be additional charges and signed an acknowledgement of that, which the hospital provided to NBC News. (Carson says he recalls no discussion of the potential for additional charges.) When Carson refused to pay, he was sued by Collection Center Inc., a debt collection firm that has often filed lawsuits against patients on behalf of the hospital, the academic study shows. In 2023, Carson and the collection firm conducted a mediation, according to court documents. Carson wound up paying only one-third of the additional charges to settle the case. "I was surprised they caved that fast," Carson told NBC News. "Traci and I could easily have paid the $4,000 and our lives gone on. But this was a principle thing." Fisher, the patient advocate, said the outcome of Carson's case is revealing. "No one should ever pay that first bill," she said. "The onus of proof needs to be on the hospital and the insurance company to prove that they have not overcharged us."

byRoger Fisher

in

May 30, 2025

Facing sky-high medical bills? Your hospital may have overcharged you

Facing sky-high medical bills? Your hospital may have overcharged you After Blake Pfeifer, a veteran plumber in Colorado Springs, Colorado, ...

Read More